On 2024-Feb-22, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> > I propose the attached. (Extra context so that the full paragraph can
> > be read from the comfort of your email program.)
>
> This reads awkwardly to me. I think it'd be better to construct it
> so that DO NOTHING's requirement is stated exactly parallel to the other
> three clause types, more or less as attached.
Sure, that works.
> BTW, if you read it without paying attention to markup, you'll notice
> that we are saying things like
>
> If you specify an insert action, you must have the INSERT
> privilege on the target_table_name.
>
> which is fairly nonsensical: we don't define privileges on the name
> of something.
Hmm, you're right, this is not strictly correct.
> While I've not done anything about that here, I wonder if we shouldn't
> just write "privilege on the target table" without any special markup.
That would work for me.
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/