Re: Describing Postgres as "object-relational" on the home page
От | Karl O. Pinc |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Describing Postgres as "object-relational" on the home page |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20240101192242.608a25cb@slate.karlpinc.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Describing Postgres as "object-relational" on the home page (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
On Mon, 1 Jan 2024 14:58:47 -0800 Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote: > On 1/1/24 11:44, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > > On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 14:40:49 -0500 > > "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote: > > >> I don't really follow what you're suggesting here. > > > > The suggestion here is to first, change the "object-relational" > > sentence as has been discussed. (Then, tl,dr; use a interactive > > "word cloud") But instead of coming up with wording describing > > functionality, workloads, etc., to simply say "PostgrSQL does lots > > more stuff." on the home page and link that to a page with nothing > > but keywords. The keywords can be linked to descriptions or project > > pages, or not. > > > > That way nobody has to write sentences, and more importantly, nobody > > has to maintain much when there's a new hot technology or > > figure out what's important enough to put on the home page. Just > > add a new keyword to the keywords page. (Especially labor free if > > the keyword page is a pg wiki page.) > > > > To extend this idea, just a list of keywords is not engaging. > > Categorizing the keywords by attaching one or more tags to each > > opens up possibilities for interaction and alternate ways to view > > the keywords. In particular the user can find keywords by tag and > > so keywords need not be categorized in a fixed fashion. > > This would likely only be interesting if the keywords were linked to > > somewhere so that after getting a relevant set of keywords > > the reader could follow the links to find information or tools. > > Please no, this is just another version of word salad. Maybe so. Though it seems common and useful to have one thing categorized into multiple categories. I think categories guide the inquisitive. But this is all useless hand-waving, at least for me, because I'm not volunteering to do the work. Apologies if I've taken too much of your time. Regards, Karl <kop@karlpinc.com> Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward." -- Robert A. Heinlein
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: