Re: Report planning memory in EXPLAIN ANALYZE
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Report planning memory in EXPLAIN ANALYZE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 202311211824.da7igma5vvrk@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Report planning memory in EXPLAIN ANALYZE (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Report planning memory in EXPLAIN ANALYZE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I gave this a quick look. I think the usefulness aspect is already established in general terms; the bit I'm not so sure about is whether we want it enabled by default. For many cases it'd just be noise. Perhaps we want it hidden behind something like "EXPLAIN (MEMORY)" or such, particularly since things like "allocated" (which, per David, seems to be the really useful metric) seems too much a PG-developer value rather than an end-user value. If EXPLAIN (MEMORY) is added, then probably auto_explain needs a corresponding flag, and doc updates. Some code looks to be in weird places. Why is calc_mem_usage, which operates on MemoryContextCounters, in explain.c instead of mcxt.c? why is MemUsage in explain.h instead of memnodes.h? I moved both. I also renamed them, to MemoryContextSizeDifference() and MemoryUsage respectively; fixup patch attached. I see no reason for this to be three separate patches anymore. The EXPLAIN docs (explain.sgml) need an update to mention the new flag and the new output, too. -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: