On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 12:47:29PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
>> ... and it looks like some of the back-branches are failing for Windows.
>> I'm assuming this is because c290e79 was only back-patched to v15. My
>> first instinct is just to back-patch that one all the way to v11, but maybe
>> there's an alternative involving #ifdef WIN32. Are there any concerns with
>> back-patching c290e79?
>
> Sounds fine to me.
Thanks, done.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com