Re: Included xid in restoring reorder buffer changes from disk log message
От | Kyotaro Horiguchi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Included xid in restoring reorder buffer changes from disk log message |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20231010.102905.1157461315982553012.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Included xid in restoring reorder buffer changes from disk log message (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Included xid in restoring reorder buffer changes from disk log message
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At Fri, 6 Oct 2023 14:58:13 +0530, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote in > On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 at 11:53, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > > It makes sense to include xid in the debug message, earlier I thought > > that will it be a good idea to also print the toplevel_xid. But I > > think it is for debug purposes and only we have the xid we can fetch > > the other parameters so maybe adding xid is good enough. +1 > While having a look at the reorderbuffer code, I noticed that this > changes were still not committed. > Here is a rebased version of the patch. While this patch makes the following change on the de-serializing side; - elog(DEBUG2, "restored %u/%u changes from disk", + elog(DEBUG2, "restored %u/%u changes of XID %u from disk", the counter part ReorderBufferSerializeTXN() has the following message. > elog(DEBUG2, "spill %u changes in XID %u to disk", > (uint32) txn->nentries_mem, txn->xid); It might be preferable for those two messages to have a corresponding appearance. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: