Re: pg_stat_get_backend_subxact() and backend IDs?
От | Nathan Bossart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_stat_get_backend_subxact() and backend IDs? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20230824025140.GB1128857@nathanxps13.lan обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_stat_get_backend_subxact() and backend IDs? (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_stat_get_backend_subxact() and backend IDs?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 07:32:06PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote: > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 10:22:49AM +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote: >> Looking at the code, this is happening because >> "pgstat_fetch_stat_local_beentry()" >> expects to be passed the backend ID as an integer representing a 1-based index >> referring to "localBackendStatusTable", but "pg_stat_get_backend_subxact()" >> is presumably intended to take the actual BackendId , as per other >> "pg_stat_get_XXX()" >> functions. > > Yes, this was changed in d7e39d7, but 10ea0f9 seems to have missed the > memo. BTW I'd argue that this is a bug in v16 that we should try to fix before GA, so I've added an open item [0]. I assigned it to Robert (CC'd) since he was the committer, but I'm happy to pick it up. [0] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_16_Open_Items#Open_Issues -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: