Re: Should we put command options in alphabetical order in the doc?
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Should we put command options in alphabetical order in the doc? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20230419084747.suskrykkzm2ity5e@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Should we put command options in alphabetical order in the doc? (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Should we put command options in alphabetical order in the doc?
Re: Should we put command options in alphabetical order in the doc? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2023-Apr-18, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > While I'm certain that nobody will agree with me on every little > detail, I have to imagine that most would find my preferred ordering > quite understandable and unsurprising, at a high level -- this is not > a hopelessly idiosyncratic ranking, that could just as easily have > been generated by a PRNG. People may not easily agree that "apples are > more important than oranges, or vice-versa", but what does it matter? > I've really only put each option into buckets of items with *roughly* > the same importance. All of the details beyond that don't matter to > me, at all. I agree with you that roughly bucketing items is a good approach. Within each bucket we can then sort alphabetically. -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "If you have nothing to say, maybe you need just the right tool to help you not say it." (New York Times, about Microsoft PowerPoint)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: