Re: monitoring usage count distribution

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Nathan Bossart
Тема Re: monitoring usage count distribution
Дата
Msg-id 20230408001816.GA519579@nathanxps13
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: monitoring usage count distribution  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 02:29:31PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not sure if there is consensus for 0002, but I reviewed and pushed
> 0001.  I made one non-cosmetic change: it no longer skips invalid
> buffers.  Otherwise, the row for usage count 0 would be pretty useless.
> Also it seemed to me that sum(buffers) ought to agree with the
> shared_buffers setting.

Makes sense.  Thanks!

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Is RecoveryConflictInterrupt() entirely safe in a signal handler?
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints