Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys

Hi,

On 2023-04-07 22:54:01 +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> That looks good to me

Cool.

I think I'll push these in a few hours. While this needed more changes than
I'd like shortly before the freeze, I think they're largely not in very
interesting bits and pieces - and this feature has been in the works for about
three eternities, and it is blocking a bunch of highly requested features.

If anybody still has energy, I would appreciate a look at 0001, 0002, the new
pieces I added, to make what's now 0003 and 0004 cleaner.


> 0005 is missing author/reviewer, I'd propose:
> [...]

Thanks, I'll integrate them...


> It's hard (given the amount of emails that have been send during all this time),

Indeed.

Greetings,

Andres Freund