Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often
От | Kyotaro Horiguchi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20230329.132155.629765142788133576.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often
Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At Wed, 29 Mar 2023 12:09:08 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote in > timeing perfectly. I think we might accidentally add a reload > timing. In that case, the assumption could break. In most cases, I > think we use snapshotting in various ways to avoid unintended variable > changes. (And I beilieve the analyze code also does that.) Okay, I was missing the following code. autovacuum.c:2893 /* * If any of the cost delay parameters has been set individually for * this table, disable the balancing algorithm. */ tab->at_dobalance = !(avopts && (avopts->vacuum_cost_limit > 0 || avopts->vacuum_cost_delay > 0)); So, sorry for the noise. I'll review it while this into cnosideration. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: