Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Nathan Bossart
Тема Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command
Дата
Msg-id 20230301232633.GA1825532@nathanxps13
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 03:13:04PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> FWIW, I think we could rely on va_start() et al to be signal safe. The
> standardese isn't super clear about this, because they aren't functions, and
> posix only talks about functions being async signal safe...

Good to know.  I couldn't tell whether that was a safe assumption from
briefly reading around.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Memory leak from ExecutorState context?
Следующее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: We shouldn't signal process groups with SIGQUIT