Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20230301180953.b64tekcnh43xtzqn@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM
Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2023-Mar-01, Michael Paquier wrote: > +-- PROCESS_MAIN option > +VACUUM (PROCESS_MAIN FALSE) vactst; > +VACUUM (PROCESS_MAIN FALSE, PROCESS_TOAST FALSE) vactst; > +VACUUM (PROCESS_MAIN FALSE, FULL) vactst; > > Thinking a bit here. This set of tests does not make sure that the > main relation and/or the toast relation have been actually processed. > pg_stat_user_tables does not track what's happening on the toast > relations. So... What about adding some tests in 100_vacuumdb.pl > that rely on vacuumdb --verbose and check the logs produced? We > should make sure that the toast or the main relation are processed, > by tracking, for example, logs like vacuuming "schema.table". When > FULL is involved, we may want to track the changes on relfilenodes > depending on what's wanted. Maybe instead of reading the log, read values from pg_stat_all_tables. -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Uno puede defenderse de los ataques; contra los elogios se esta indefenso"
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: