Re: Exit walsender before confirming remote flush in logical replication
От | Kyotaro Horiguchi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Exit walsender before confirming remote flush in logical replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20230213.105651.2039856423945624452.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Exit walsender before confirming remote flush in logical replication ("Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Exit walsender before confirming remote flush in logical replication
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At Fri, 10 Feb 2023 12:40:43 +0000, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote in > Dear Amit, > > > Can't we have this option just as a bool (like shutdown_immediate)? > > Why do we want to keep multiple modes? > > Of course we can use boolean instead, but current style is motivated by the post[1]. > This allows to add another option in future, whereas I do not have idea now. > > I want to ask other reviewers which one is better... > > [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20230208.112717.1140830361804418505.horikyota.ntt%40gmail.com IMHO I vaguely don't like that we lose a means to specify the default behavior here. And I'm not sure we definitely don't need other than flush and immedaite for both physical and logical replication. If it's not the case, I don't object to make it a Boolean. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: