Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux?

On 2023-02-08 13:12:15 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 11:14:39AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Actually, I completely forgot to take into account that there is a
> > minor release planned for next week:
> > https://www.postgresql.org/developer/roadmap/
> > 
> > So I'll hold on a bit longer here, until the next versions get their
> > tags.
> 
> So, the backpatch down to 12 is straight-forward, with some conflicts
> in ./configure.  ~12 handles also differently its CFLAGS with
> pg_config.h.win32.  11 is more annoying because it lacks
> HAVE_SYS_PROCCTL_H and it would need a partial backport of f98b847.  I
> am not completely sure if this could have more side effects, though,
> even if the part of pmsignal.c is left out.  It should not..
> 
> At the end, I have just done this stuff down to ~12, 11 does not seem
> worth the trouble as the next stable version to go out of support.
> I'll reduce gokiburi's script a bit, as a result, until the oldest
> version support is v12.

That seems reasonable to me.