Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20221118184314.e4z3n5wzpcif5r52@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-Nov-18, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 7:24 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote: > > But I'm fine if you'd like to move on with the SET ROLE privilege > > instead, as long as we believe it grants a stable set of capabilities > > (and conversely, that if the SET ROLE privilege is revoked, that it > > revokes a stable set of capabilities). > > OK. > > Here's a rebased v3 to see what cfbot thinks. I think this hunk in dumpRoleMembership() leaves an unwanted line behind. /* - * Previous versions of PostgreSQL also did not have a grant-level + * Previous versions of PostgreSQL also did not have grant-level options. * INHERIT option. */ (I was just looking at the doc part of this patch.) -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "El hombre nunca sabe de lo que es capaz hasta que lo intenta" (C. Dickens)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: