Re: pg_upgrade test failure
От | Justin Pryzby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade test failure |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20221018043144.GF7745@telsasoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade test failure (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade test failure
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 01:06:15PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 09:47:37AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote: > > * Server 2019, as used on CI, still uses the traditional NT semantics > > (unlink is asynchronous, when all handles closes) > > * the fix I proposed has the right effect (I will follow up with tests > > to demonstrate) > > Wow, nice investigation. And cirrus does not offer a newer option > either.. Currently Andres builds images based on cirrus's 2019 image, but I think we could use any windows docker image. > Do you think that Windows server 2022 (successor of 2019) is > able to use POSIX semantics for unlink()? I think it's possible to use it now, like what's done here. https://commitfest.postgresql.org/40/3347/ The only caveat is that it's done conditionally.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: