Re: BUG #17646: create rule named "_RETURN" will cause pg core
От | Ilya Anfimov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #17646: create rule named "_RETURN" will cause pg core |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20221017143338.GA3864491@azor.tzirechnoy.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #17646: create rule named "_RETURN" will cause pg core (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #17646: create rule named "_RETURN" will cause pg core
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 10:17:55AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: > > here is a test case > > > create table t (id integer); > > create view v1 as select * from t; > > create or replace rule "_RETURN" as on UPDATE to v1 do instead select * from > > t; > > Meh. We should be preventing you from doing that. > > (Although the core dump is also not great --- something should've noticed > the bogosity of the plan earlier than this.) Id doesn't look much of a plan bogosity, but rather implicit deletion of the "_RETURN" on select rule. Consider the behaviour of the direct drop rule: ilan=*> create table t (id integer); CREATE TABLE ilan=*> create view v1 as select * from t; CREATE VIEW ilan=*> DROP RULE "_RETURN" ON v1; ERROR: cannot drop rule _RETURN on view v1 because view v1 requires it ПОДСКАЗКА: You can drop view v1 instead. > > regards, tom lane >
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: