Re: A doubt about a newly added errdetail
От | Kyotaro Horiguchi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A doubt about a newly added errdetail |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20220928.150034.1325913962801104491.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A doubt about a newly added errdetail (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: A doubt about a newly added errdetail
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At Tue, 27 Sep 2022 12:19:35 +0200, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote in > Yeah, since you're changing another word in that line, it's ok to move > the parameter line off-string. (If you were only changing the parameter > to %s and there was no message duplication, I would reject the patch as > useless.) I'm fine with that. By the way, related to the area, I found the following error messages. > errmsg("publication \"%s\" is defined as FOR ALL TABLES", > NameStr(pubform->pubname)), > errdetail("Schemas cannot be added to or dropped from FOR ALL TABLES publications."))); It looks tome that the errmsg and errordetail are reversed. Isn't the following order common? > errmsg("schemas cannot be added to or dropped from publication \"%s\".", > NameStr(pubform->pubname)), > errdetail("The publication is defined as FOR ALL TABLES."))); regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: