Re: [PATCH]Feature improvement for MERGE tab completion
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH]Feature improvement for MERGE tab completion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20220920155105.y7rb57pb5fpoxmln@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH]Feature improvement for MERGE tab completion (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-Sep-18, Fujii Masao wrote: > The tab-completion code for MERGE was added in the middle of that for LOCK TABLE. > This would be an oversight of the commit that originally supported tab-completion > for MERGE. I fixed this issue. Argh, thanks. > "MERGE" was tab-completed with just after "EXPLAIN" or "EXPLAIN ANALYZE", etc. > Since "INTO" always follows "MERGE", it's better to complete with "MERGE INTO" > there. I replaced "MERGE" with "MERGE INTO" in those tab-completions. OK, that would be similar to REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW. The rules starting at line 4111 make me a bit nervous, since nowhere we're restricting them to operating only on MERGE lines. I don't think it's a real problem since USING is not terribly common anyway. Likewise for the ones with WHEN [NOT] MATCHED. I kinda wish we had a way to search for stuff like "keyword MERGE appears earlier in the command", but we don't have that. -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "I'm always right, but sometimes I'm more right than other times." (Linus Torvalds)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: