Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve performance of SendRowDescriptionMessage.
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve performance of SendRowDescriptionMessage. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20220813190843.wrs3feelaxy434un@awork3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve performance ofSendRowDescriptionMessage. (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve performance of SendRowDescriptionMessage.
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
Hi Noah, On 2017-10-13 11:24:05 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2017-10-13 14:19:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > > So it'd probably better to introduce a FORCE_DISABLE_RESTRICT=yes, set > > > at the same place, that's then tested before running the relevant > > > configure check? > > > > +1. I think you don't actually have to skip the configure check, > > and there might be some value in letting it carry on normally > > (so that "restrict" is set properly). We'd just want it to affect > > what pg_restrict gets defined as. Something like > > > if test "$ac_cv_c_restrict" = "no" -o "x$FORCE_DISABLE_RESTRICT" = "xyes"; then > > pg_restrict="" > > else > > pg_restrict="$ac_cv_c_restrict" > > Yea, that works. Will make it so. Any chance you could check if this is still needed? I've a FIXME about it in the meson code that I'd like to get rid of :) Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: