Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size
Дата
Msg-id 20220809192257.yanxb6cazo2tjkkh@awork3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size  ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Hi,

On 2022-08-09 15:17:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> We have delayed releases for $COOL_FEATURE in the past, and I think
> our batting average on that is still .000: not once has it worked out
> well.

I think it semi worked when jsonb (?) first went in - it took a while and a
lot of effort from a lot of people, but in the end we made it work, and it was
a success from our user's perspectives, I think. OTOH, it's not a great sign
this is around json again...

- Andres

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Reducing the chunk header sizes on all memory context types
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: moving basebackup code to its own directory