Re: bug on log generation ?
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bug on log generation ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20220808160204.owjxz2eb234fba3k@awork3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bug on log generation ? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: bug on log generation ?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2022-08-08 10:32:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > > What platform is this on? Is it possible that on some platform the chunk > > size we're using is not doing an atomic write? > > Another idea is that some of the write() calls are failing --- elog.c > doesn't check for that. I was suspicious of those as well. It might be a good idea to at least write such failures to stderr, otherwise it's just about impossible to debug. Not that stderr will always point anywhere useful... I can imagine that a system under heavy memory pressure might fail writing, if there's a lot of writes in a row or such. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: