Re: Cygwin cleanup
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Cygwin cleanup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20220804040605.izlmfu6wxmuhl7np@awork3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Cygwin cleanup (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2022-07-28 17:23:19 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 10:04:04AM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote: > > > > XXX This should use a canned Docker image with all the right packages > > > > installed > > > > > > Has anyone tried using non-canned images ? It sounds like this could reduce > > > the 4min startup time for windows. > > > > > > https://cirrus-ci.org/guide/docker-builder-vm/#dockerfile-as-a-ci-environment > > > > Yeah, I had that working once. Not sure what the pros and cons would be for us. > > I think it could be a lot faster to start, since cirrus caches the generated > docker image locally. Rather than (I gather) pulling the image every time. I'm quite certain that is not true. All the docker images built are just uploaded to the google container registry and then downloaded onto a *separate* windows host. The dockerfile: stuff generates a separate task running on a separate machine... It's a bit better for non-windows containers, because there google has some optimization for pulling image (pieces) on demand or such. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: