Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns
От | Kyotaro Horiguchi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20220803.102027.1786766955594381576.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At Tue, 2 Aug 2022 13:54:43 +0530, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote in > On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 12:00 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi > <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > + { > > + int save_errno = errno; > > + > > + CloseTransientFile(fd); > > + > > + if (readBytes < 0) > > + { > > + errno = save_errno; > > + ereport(ERROR, > > > > Do we need the CloseTransientFile(fd) there? This call requires errno > > to be remembered but anyway OpenTransientFile'd files are to be close > > at transaction end. Actually CloseTransientFile() is not called > > before error'ing-out at error in other places. .. > We just moved it to a separate function as the same code is being > duplicated to multiple places. There are code paths that doesn't CloseTransientFile() explicitly, too. If there were no need of save_errno there, that'd be fine. But otherwise I guess we prefer to let the orphan fds closed by ERROR and I don't think we need to preserve the less-preferred code pattern (if we actually prefer not to have the explicit call). regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: