Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion)

On 2022-Jul-21, Thomas Munro wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 11:01 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:

> > I've got no opinions on this.  I don't like either 1 or 3, so I'm going
> > to add and backpatch a new GUC allow_recovery_tablespaces as the
> > override mechanism.
> >
> > If others disagree with this choice, please speak up.
> 
> Would it help if we back-patched the allow_in_place_tablespaces stuff?
>  I'm not sure how hard/destabilising that would be, but I could take a
> look tomorrow.

Yeah, I think that would reduce cruft.  I'm not sure this is more
against backpatching policy or less, compared to adding a separate
GUC just for this bugfix.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera        Breisgau, Deutschland  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"The problem with the facetime model is not just that it's demoralizing, but
that the people pretending to work interrupt the ones actually working."
                                                           (Paul Graham)