Hi,
On 2022-05-12 15:15:10 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 04:09:47PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Well, what about the attached then? While looking at all the headers
> > in the tree, I have noticed that __pg_log_level is not marked, but
> > we'd better paint a PGDLLIMPORT also for it? This is getting used by
> > pgbench for some unlikely() business, as one example.
>
> After an extra look, PGDLLIMPORT missing from __pg_log_level looks
> like an imbroglio between 8ec5694, that has added the marking, and
> 9a374b77 that has removed it the same day. All that has been fixed in
> 5edeb57.
It seems pretty nonsensical to add PGDLLIMPORT to frontend only headers /
variables. What is that supposed to mean?
Greetings,
Andres Freund