Re: Implicitly created operator family not listed by pg_event_trigger_ddl_commands
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Implicitly created operator family not listed by pg_event_trigger_ddl_commands |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 202205041017.uc3dxylntais@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Implicitly created operator family not listed by pg_event_trigger_ddl_commands (LEMAIRE Leslie (Chargée de mission) - SG/SNUM/UNI/DRC <leslie.lemaire@developpement-durable.gouv.fr>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Implicitly created operator family not listed by pg_event_trigger_ddl_commands
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 2022-May-02, LEMAIRE Leslie (Chargée de mission) - SG/SNUM/UNI/DRC wrote: > As stated in the documentation [1], creating an operator class without > specifying the FAMILY option will create an operator family with the same > name as the new class if it doesn't already exist. In this case, my event > trigger is activated through the "CREATE OPERATOR CLASS" tag as usual, but > pg_event_trigger_ddl_commands() still returns only one row - for the > operator class creation. I would have expected it to list the creation of > the operator family as well. I agree, this looks like an omission somewhere -- the extra object should have been reported. -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: