Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20220415051205.6abhlilh6fnjgohr@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2022-04-14 19:45:15 -0700, Noah Misch wrote: > I suspect the failure is somehow impossible in "check". Yesterday, I cranked > up the number of locales, so there are now a lot more installcheck. Before > that, each farm run had one "check" and two "installcheck". Those days saw > ten installcheck failures, zero check failures. I notice that the buildfarm appears to run initdb with syncing enabled ("syncing data to disk ... ok" in the initdb steps). Whereas pg_regress uses --no-sync. I wonder if that's what makes the difference? Now that you reproduced it, does it still reproduce with --no-sync added? Also worth noting that pg_regress doesn't go through pg_ctl... Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: