Re: ubsan

Hi,

On 2022-03-23 15:58:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > I think we should backpatch both, based on the reasoning in
> > 46ab07ffda9d6c8e63360ded2d4568aa160a7700 ?
> 
> Yeah, I suppose.  Is anyone going to step up and run a buildfarm
> member with ubsan enabled?  (I'm already checking -fsanitize=alignment
> on longfin, but it seems advisable to keep that separate from
> -fsanitize=undefined.)

I'm planning to enable it on two of mine. Looks like gcc and clang find
slightly different things, so I was intending to enable it on one of each.

Greetings,

Andres Freund