Re: pg_stop_backup() v2 incorrectly marked as proretset
От | Kyotaro Horiguchi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_stop_backup() v2 incorrectly marked as proretset |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20220302.172235.1181597714315490061.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_stop_backup() v2 incorrectly marked as proretset (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_stop_backup() v2 incorrectly marked as proretset
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At Wed, 2 Mar 2022 16:46:01 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote in > Hi all, > > In my hunt looking for incorrect SRFs, I have noticed a new case of a > system function marked as proretset while it builds and returns only > one record. And this is a popular one: pg_stop_backup(), labelled > v2. > > This leads to a lot of unnecessary work, as the function creates a > tuplestore it has no need for with the usual set of checks related to > SRFs. The logic can be be simplified as of the attached. > > Thoughts? That direction seems find to me. But the patch forgets to remove an useless variable. > /* Initialise attributes information in the tuple descriptor */ > tupdesc = CreateTemplateTupleDesc(PG_STOP_BACKUP_V2_COLS); > TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 1, "lsn", > PG_LSNOID, -1, 0); I think we can use get_call_resuilt_type here. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: