Re: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure
От | Kyotaro Horiguchi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20220217.171405.1911593760090019851.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure ("kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At Thu, 17 Feb 2022 04:32:26 +0000, "kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote in > > I understood here as removing following mechanism from core: > > > > * disable timeout at end of tx. > > While reading again and this part might be wrong. > Sorry for inconvenience. > But anyway some codes should be (re)moved from core, right? I think we just don't need to add the special timeout kind to the core. postgres_fdw can use USER_TIMEOUT and it would be suffiction to keep running health checking regardless of transaction state then fire query cancel if disconnection happens. As I said in the previous main, possible extra query cancel woud be safe. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: