Re: pgsql: TAP tests: check for postmaster.pid anyway when "pg_ctl start" f
От | Noah Misch |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: TAP tests: check for postmaster.pid anyway when "pg_ctl start" f |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20220210023537.GA3222837@rfd.leadboat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: TAP tests: check for postmaster.pid anyway when "pg_ctl start" f (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: TAP tests: check for postmaster.pid anyway when "pg_ctl start" f
Re: pgsql: TAP tests: check for postmaster.pid anyway when "pg_ctl start" f |
Список | pgsql-committers |
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 05:30:44PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > > What I'm thinking of doing is inventing a "soft_stop" variant of > > Cluster::stop that won't complain if pg_ctl stop fails, and then > > having 017_shm's poll_start() call that before retrying the start > > call. > > I did that, modeling the details on Cluster::start's fail_ok option. On AIX, this pair of commits added 5-10h of runtime to 017_shm.pl. Before 6c4a890 or 4fdbf9a: https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=hoverfly&dt=2022-01-19%2020%3A41%3A47 [21:14:17] t/017_shm.pl ......................... ok 7360 ms ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 1.62 cusr 0.71 csys = 2.34 CPU) After both: https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=hoverfly&dt=2022-01-21%2021%3A03%3A28 [07:52:31] t/017_shm.pl ......................... ok 36908794 ms ( 0.00 usr 0.00 sys + 5.16 cusr 16.04 csys = 21.20 CPU)
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: