Re: BUG #17389: pg_repack creates race conditions on streaming replicas
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #17389: pg_repack creates race conditions on streaming replicas |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20220131215407.3p3ycstwnj663apa@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #17389: pg_repack creates race conditions on streaming replicas (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #17389: pg_repack creates race conditions on streaming replicas
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Hi, On 2022-01-31 16:11:15 +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote: > We've noticed that at least since 9.5, running pg_repack causes a race > conditions on our streaming replicas, but _not_ on the primary where > pg_repack is running. This manifests itself as a client briefly unable to > open the relation getting repacked - but, in our testing and experience, > only on the replica. pg_repack is not part of postgres, so you're going to have to report this to the developers of pg_repack. > I would blame pg_repack - its whole purpose for being > is to transparently remake tables, and quite possibly it got some of the > details wrong - except that if its behavior appears atomic to clients on the > primary, then surely it should on the replicas too? pg_repack modifies catalogs in an unsupported way, so it's not surprising you'd see some odd effects. Postgres locking and visibility logic doesn't know about what pg_repack is doing, so it can't enforce correct semantics. I'd assume that the repack developers haven't gotten the locking logic quite right someplace. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: