Re: A test for replay of regression tests
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A test for replay of regression tests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20220127225926.dheegxfitrkvtufw@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A test for replay of regression tests (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2022-01-27 14:36:32 -0800, Andres Freund wrote: > > On my windows test instance where I noticed this (w10, > > msys2/ucrt), check took 516s and this test took 685s. > > Hm. That's both excruciatingly slow. Way way slower than what I see here, also > w10, msys2/ucrt. Any chance the test instance has windows defender running, > without a directory exclusion? I saw that trash performance to a near > standstill. Could you post the regression test output with the timings? Unless it's AV, I don't see why a windows VM with a moderate amount of memory should take that long. Do the test times get less bad if you use PG_TEST_USE_UNIX_SOCKETS=1 PG_REGRESS_SOCK_DIR: "c:/some-dir/"? I see there's reports that the connection-timeout problem can be a lot worse on windows, because several applications, e.g. docker, add additional names for localhost. Are there any non-commented entries in C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts > Does it get better with the attached patch? I pushed something like it now - seemed to be no reason to wait, given it makes think less slow on my VM. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: