Re: [PATCH] pg_stat_toast v0.4

On 2022-Jan-03, Gunnar "Nick" Bluth wrote:

> Am 03.01.22 um 17:50 schrieb Justin Pryzby:

> > Soon you will think this is fun :)
> 
> As long as you're happy with plain patches like the attached one, I may ;-)

Well, with a zero-byte patch, not very much ...

BTW why do you number with a "0." prefix?  It could just be "4" and "5"
and so on.  There's no value in two-part version numbers for patches.
Also, may I suggest that "git format-patch -vN" with varying N is an
easier way to generate patches to attach?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera              Valdivia, Chile  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Hay quien adquiere la mala costumbre de ser infeliz" (M. A. Evans)