Re: Re: [Pg-migrator-general] Composite types break pg_migrated tables
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [Pg-migrator-general] Composite types break pg_migrated tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20214.1249655129@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [Pg-migrator-general] Composite types break pg_migrated tables (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [Pg-migrator-general] Composite types break
pg_migrated tables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> That might be a bit excessive. As I understand it, arrays of built-in types >> (e.g., int[]) should work fine. I suspect the majority of uses of arrays will >> be with built-in types, so allowing that would help a significant portion of >> installations. > Agreed. I realized that last night, and have modified pg_migrator to > test FirstNormalObjectId. That's really the wrong thing. It's safe to assume OIDs below 10000 are portable across versions, because for them not to be would require someone to have changed a hand assignment. However, OIDs between 10000 and 16K are assigned on-the-fly by initdb, and those are *not* likely to be portable across versions. As an example, the rowtype for pg_statistic has slightly different OIDs in 8.3 and 8.4. So if you allow someone to port a database that is using a system catalog's rowtype, it will fail. Admittedly that's not a real likely scenario, but if you're going to have a check it should be accurate. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: