Re: PublicationActions - use bit flags.
От | Justin Pryzby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PublicationActions - use bit flags. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20211229163014.GO24477@telsasoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PublicationActions - use bit flags. (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PublicationActions - use bit flags.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 11:18:41AM +1100, Peter Smith wrote: > For some reason the current HEAD PublicationActions is a struct of > boolean representing combinations of the 4 different "publication > actions". > > I felt it is more natural to implement boolean flag combinations using > a bitmask instead of a struct of bools. IMO using the bitmask also > simplifies assignment and checking of said flags. Peter E made a suggestion to use a similar struct with bools last year for REINDEX. https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7ec67c56-2377-cd05-51a0-691104404abe@enterprisedb.com Alvaro pointed out that the integer flags are better for ABI compatibility - it would allow adding a new flag in backbranches, if that were needed for a bugfix. But that's not very compelling, since the bools have existed in v10... Also, the booleans directly correspond with the catalog. + if (pubform->pubinsert) pub->pubactions |= PUBACTION_INSERT; This is usually written like: pub->pubactions |= (pubform->pubinsert ? PUBACTION_INSERT : 0) -- Justin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: