Re: Addition of --no-sync to pg_upgrade for test speedup
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Addition of --no-sync to pg_upgrade for test speedup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 202112201346.kd5aiqeraozg@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Addition of --no-sync to pg_upgrade for test speedup (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-Dec-16, Michael Paquier wrote: > In pg_upgrade, we let the flush happen with initdb --sync-only, based > on the binary path of the new cluster, so I think that we are not > going to miss any test coverage by skipping that. There was one patch of mine with breakage that only manifested in the pg_upgrade test *because* of its lack of no-sync. I'm afraid that this change would hide certain problems. https://postgr.es/m/20210130023011.n545o54j65t4kgxn@alap3.anarazel.de > Thoughts or opinions? I'm not 100% comfortable with this. What can we do to preserve *some* testing that include syncing? Maybe some option that a few buildfarm animals use? -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "The Postgresql hackers have what I call a "NASA space shot" mentality. Quite refreshing in a world of "weekend drag racer" developers." (Scott Marlowe)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: