Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT.
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 202111081745.2xfjjcflasr6@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT. (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-Nov-08, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Alvaro Herrera (alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org) wrote: > > That said, if the list is short, then additional predefined roles seem > > preferrable to having a ton of infrastructure code that might be much > > more clutter than what seems a short list of additional predefined roles. > > None of this strikes me as a 'ton of infrastructure code' and so I'm not > quite sure I'm following the argument being made here. I was referring specifically to Andres' idea of having additional DDL commands handled as special GRANTable privileges, https://postgr.es/m/20211104224636.5qg6cfyjkw52rh4d@alap3.anarazel.de -- Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Hay quien adquiere la mala costumbre de ser infeliz" (M. A. Evans)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: