Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c)
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20210921230055.sbdfdli6myiimxvm@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2021-09-21 18:21:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > > On 2021-09-21 15:09:11 -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote: > >> Currently when determining where CoerceToDomainValue can be read, > >> it evaluates every step in a loop. > >> But, I think that the expression is immutable and should be solved only > >> once. > > > What is immutable here? > > I think Ranier has a point here. The clear intent of this bit: > > /* > * If first time through, determine where CoerceToDomainValue > * nodes should read from. > */ > if (domainval == NULL) > { > > is that we only need to emit the EEOP_MAKE_READONLY once when there are > multiple CHECK constraints. But because domainval has the wrong lifespan, > that test is constant-true, and we'll do it over each time to little > purpose. Oh, I clearly re-skimmed the code too quickly. Sorry for that! > (AFAICS anyway) > > I'm unexcited by the proposed move of the save_innermost_domainval/null > variables, though. It adds no correctness and it forces an additional > level of indentation of a good deal of code, as the patch fails to show. Yea. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: