Re: Gather performance analysis
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Gather performance analysis |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20210908063347.iqqwzjh6eve4zstp@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Gather performance analysis (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Gather performance analysis
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2021-09-08 11:45:16 +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote: > On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 3:08 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > > > > Looking at this profile made me wonder if this was a build without > > optimizations. The pg_atomic_read_u64()/pg_atomic_read_u64_impl() calls > > should > > be inlined. And while perf can reconstruct inlined functions when using > > --call-graph=dwarf, they show up like "pg_atomic_read_u64 (inlined)" for > > me. > > > > Yeah, for profiling generally I build without optimizations so that I can > see all the functions in the stack, so yeah profile results are without > optimizations build but the performance results are with optimizations > build. I'm afraid that makes the profiles just about meaningless :(. > Is this with or without patch, I mean can we see a comparison that patch > improved anything in your environment? It was without any patches. I'll try the patch in a bit. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: