Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 202109041441.gyqpsvi44fff@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-Sep-04, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 2:19 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > > > On 2021-Sep-02, Rahila Syed wrote: > > > > > After thinking about this, I think it is best to remove the entire table > > > from publication, > > > if a column specified in the column filter is dropped from the table. > > > > Hmm, I think it would be cleanest to give responsibility to the user: if > > the column to be dropped is in the filter, then raise an error, aborting > > the drop. > > Do you think that will make sense if the user used Cascade (Alter > Table ... Drop Column ... Cascade)? ... ugh. Since CASCADE is already defined to be a potentially-data-loss operation, then that may be acceptable behavior. For sure the default RESTRICT behavior shouldn't do it, though. -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: