Re: pg_regress.c also sensitive to various PG* environment variables
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_regress.c also sensitive to various PG* environment variables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 202106111408.viessaz2urco@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_regress.c also sensitive to various PG* environment variables (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_regress.c also sensitive to various PG* environment variables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-Jun-11, Michael Paquier wrote: > Following up with the recent thread that dealt with the same $subject > for the TAP tests, I have gone through pg_regress.c: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/YLbjjRpucIeZ78VQ@paquier.xyz Good idea. > The list of environment variables that had better be reset when using > a temporary instance is very close to TestLib.pm, leading to the > attached. Please note that that the list of unsetted parameters has > been reorganized to be consistent with the TAP tests, and that I have > added comments referring one and the other. > > Thoughts? I think if they're to be kept in sync, then the exceptions should be noted. I mean, where PGCLIENTENCODING would otherwise be, I'd add /* PGCLIENTENCODING set above */ /* See below for PGHOSTADDR */ and so on (PGHOST and PGPORT probably don't need this because they're immediately below; not sure; but I would put them in alphabetical order in both lists for sure and then that wouldn't apply). Otherwise I would think that it's an omission and would set to fix it. -- Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: