Re: syntax question
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: syntax question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20210603193444.GD22019@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: syntax question (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: syntax question
inner subprograms ... Was: syntax question |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 03:21:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> writes: > > On 6/3/21 12:01 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 08:58:03PM +0200, Marc Millas wrote: > >>> within a function, I want to create another function. > > >> You can't create functions inside of functions; same for procedures. > > > Sure you can: > > Yeah. The actual problem here is that Marc is expecting variable > substitution to occur within a utility (DDL) statement, which it > doesn't. The workaround is to build the command as a string and > use EXECUTE, as Adrian illustrated: > > > EXECUTE 'create function ' || bidule || '() RETURNS void language > > plpgsql AS $fnc$ BEGIN END; $fnc$ '; > > This is not terribly well explained in the existing docs. I tried > to improve the explanation awhile ago in HEAD: > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/plpgsql-statements.html#PLPGSQL-STATEMENTS-GENERAL-SQL Oh, I thought he wanted to declare a function inside the function that could be called only by that function, like private functions in Oracle packages can do. Yes, you can create a function that defines a function that can be called later. I guess you could also create a function that _conditionally_ creates a function that it can call itself too. My point is that you can't create a function that has function scope --- they all have schema scope. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: