Re: storing an explicit nonce
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: storing an explicit nonce |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20210526023916.GT3048@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: storing an explicit nonce (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 10:23:46PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > If I’ve got it right, that does mean that the nonces on the replica might > differ from those on the primary though and I’m not completely sure how I feel > about that. We might wish to explicitly document that, due to such risk, users > should use unique and distinct keys on each replica that are different from the > primary and each other (not a bad idea in general anyway, but would be quite > important with this strategy). I have to think more about this, but we were planning to allow different primary and replica relation encryption keys to allow for relation key rotation. The WAL key has to be the same for both. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: