Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20210518155711.GE30270@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 08:54:56AM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:48 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > I am thiking the vacuum_cleanup_index_scale_factor existance in a PG 14 > > postgresql.conf will throw an error, unlike 13.x, so I do think we need > > to mention this so people will know to remove it from their > > postgresql.conf before upgrades, right? I don't think the PG 13.3 > > release note mention really makes it clear it has to be removed. In a > > dump/restore, so we retain the reloption > > vacuum_cleanup_index_scale_factor and just ignore it, or drop it on > > restore? I am hoping it is the later. > > There is no dump/restore hazard on upgrade to 14, since the > vacuum_cleanup_index_scale_factor reloption remains in place (it's > just not in psql tab completion anymore, nor is it documented, etc). So it is the former behavior --- "so we retain the reloption vacuum_cleanup_index_scale_factor and just ignore it"? > It is possible (though I would certainly say unlikely) that the > vacuum_cleanup_index_scale_factor GUC will be in somebody's > postgresql.conf from an earlier version, and won't be recognized on > upgrade to v14. So maybe you need to say something about that > particular issue -- which could be framed as finishing off the process > started by the 13.3 commit. But that's it. Yes. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: