Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20210518154810.GD30270@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Ответы |
Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 08:34:55AM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > In my opinion this should be interpreted as already handled by the > backpatch to 13.3, and so not necessary to handle again now -- despite > the GUC thing. It's possible that no users set the GUC at all, because > it wasn't particularly well thought out. This entire situation is > probably unprecedented (we just don't deprecate reloptions very > often), so I defer to your judgement, Bruce. I am thiking the vacuum_cleanup_index_scale_factor existance in a PG 14 postgresql.conf will throw an error, unlike 13.x, so I do think we need to mention this so people will know to remove it from their postgresql.conf before upgrades, right? I don't think the PG 13.3 release note mention really makes it clear it has to be removed. In a dump/restore, so we retain the reloption vacuum_cleanup_index_scale_factor and just ignore it, or drop it on restore? I am hoping it is the later. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: