Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 09:44:09AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> As things stand, in this case I think it *should* be included, since the
> backpatched change isn't the same as the change to HEAD (removing the GUC).
> The git_changelog output might well be wrong in this case (or, arguably, the
> "remove the GUC entirely" should've been a separate master-only commit than the
> "make the GUC do nothing" commit).

I think having the same commit message for different patches to
different branches is an unwise behavior, particularly if the commit is
release-note worthy.  (I think it is fine if the patch is purely
mechanical and hence not release-note worthy.)  The master patch is hash
9f3665fbfc and the PG 13 patch is hash 9663d12446.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.