Re: Typo in README.barrier

David,

>> Thanks for working on that.  I had a look and wondered if it might be
>> better to go into slightly less details about the exact atomic
>> function to use.  The wording there might lead you to believe you can
>> just call the atomic function on the non-atomic variable.
>> 
>> It might be best just to leave the details about how exactly to use
>> atomics by just referencing port/atomics.h.
>> 
>> Maybe something like the attached?
> 
> Thanks. Agreed and your patch looks good to me.
> 
>> I'm also a bit on the fence if this should be backpatched or not.  The
>> reasons though maybe not is that it seems unlikely maybe people would
>> not be working in master if they're developing something new.   On the
>> other side of the argument, 0ccebe779, which adjusts another README
>> was backpatched.  I'm leaning towards backpatching.
> 
> Me too. Let's backpatch.

Would you like to push the patch?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp