Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements

On 2021-May-15, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 02:21:59PM -0400, Álvaro Herrera wrote:

> > I wonder why the initial line says "query hash" instead of "query
> > identifier".  Do we want to say "hash" everywhere?  Why didn't we name
> > the GUC "compute_query_hash" in that case?
> 
> It is queryid (no underscore) in pg_stat_statements, which was a whole
> different discussion.  ;-)

Yeah, I realize that, but I wonder if we shouldn't use the term "query
identifier" instead of "query hash" in that paragraph.

> I also added Alvaro as an author of the compute_query_id item.

I've been wondering if I should ask to stick my name in other features I
helped get committed -- specifically the PQtrace() item and autovacuum
for partitioned tables.  I'll go comment in the release notes thread.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera       Valdivia, Chile
"Digital and video cameras have this adjustment and film cameras don't for the
same reason dogs and cats lick themselves: because they can."   (Ken Rockwell)